William Collins: Medical Ethics and Paternity Fraud

My recent interview about paternity fraud on LBC Radio, along with a female medical ethicist, generated an unusually high number of comments. I’m delighted to see that William Collins has used it as the starting point for another of his consistently excellent articles – here.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to William Collins: Medical Ethics and Paternity Fraud

  1. cadburycat says:

    Many years ago I talked to a guy who worked on the research for ICI Cellmark diagnostics. The scientists did not understand why the accuracy of their animal tests were not replicated in humans.
    He went and talked to the nurses on maternity wards. The husband visited in the evening, the lover in the afternoons. Biologically the Alpha male who can father healthy offspring is not the Beta male who will stick around and raise them.
    Primitive societies are matrilineal; patriarchy demands quite a sophisticated social structure and maybe we should remove State subsidy for children and give the feminists what they want -100% financial LIABILITY for their children.

    • Surely feminists want women to have 0% financial liability for their children, with male partners (whether present or absent) or taxpayers – men, mostly, who pay 72% of the income tax in the UK – paying for their little darlings and themselves in terms of housing, benefits, childcare subsidies etc.?

  2. cadburycat says:

    Possibly they might not “want” it, but it’s the logical corollary of their other demands. Make a child the sole financial responsibility of the mother with no State support and illegitimate pregnancy would disappear overnight.

    • Douglas M says:

      The logical corollary of making the child the sole financial responsibility of the mother, if the mother retains her ‘ownership’ of the child, will be an even greater number of children abused by women, and a vast increase in the use of the Infanticide Act (which is already based on disproved psuedo-science) to kill off defenceless and burdensome children.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s