Married GP (45) who spent six months in jail (of an 18-month sentence) for groping a 19-year-old woman’s breasts during an examination is cleared at a retrial after jury hears it was a ‘terrible misunderstanding’

Our thanks to Mike P for this. A 19-year-old female fantasist put a doctor through a nightmare, assisted by the criminal injustice system. She will doubtless face no repercussions.

If everyone who read this gave us just £1 – or even better, £1 monthly – we could change the world. Click here to make a difference. Thanks.

About Mike Buchanan

I'm a men's human rights advocate, writer, and publisher. My primary focus is leading the political party I launched in 2013, Justice for Men & Boys (and the women who love them). I still work actively on two campaigns I launched in early 2012, Campaign for Merit in Business and the Anti-Feminism League. In 2014 I launched The Alternative Sexism Project, aiming to raise public understanding that the sexism faced by men and boys has far more grievous consequences than the sexism faced by women and girls.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Married GP (45) who spent six months in jail (of an 18-month sentence) for groping a 19-year-old woman’s breasts during an examination is cleared at a retrial after jury hears it was a ‘terrible misunderstanding’

  1. There will be no repercussions because men don’t care. They don’t care about you, they don’t care about me, and they don’t even care about their sons.

    Someday, I hope this changes…

  2. epistemol says:

    What if there is no one to campaign for you?

    What if there are no other professionals to support you?

    What if you’ve been stopped from working for three years.
    What would you live on?

    And how many others are in the same fix?

    REAL criminals get less than 18 months for many REAL crimes.
    But then unlike this docter they have not been accused of a POLITICAL crime, which is what this is.

    That he seems happy to have dismissed this calumny as a “terrible misunderstanding” suggests he has taken a forgiving view in accordance with his religious principles.

    Well I suppose one should say ‘good for him’ in practicing what he preaches.
    However, I am under no such obligation thus I say. “NAME THE LIAR NOW”

    After all HE’S been named, and how, so I’m only asking for equality.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s